Well to remember that the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to protect us against abusive government. We need to be well enough armed that the government will think twice before they become blatantly abusive.
jim
9 months ago
Noone will ever have the magazine on a table perfectly ready to load into the gun. Shooter will have to take time to grab it out of their jacket most likely, or pants, or somwhere which will add many seconds in between each magazine
What if two magazines are taped together so all the shorter has to do is flip the magazines? What about a vest with pockets to hold new magazines? You have shown your lack of planning and knowledge. Anyone who wants to shoot the maximum number of rounds in a short time will have planned and practiced how to accomplish that.
Iggy
9 months ago
Excellent. Am sharing.
Joe R.
9 months ago
If the shooter has agreed to let their idyet ay-whole neighbors who needed a job, got the job, but instead used their authority to abuse power, (their “government”) force them to only possess lower capacity magazines, then those same idyet ay-wholes are that much closer to getting the shooter to accept fewer rounds in those magazines, then fewer magazines, then no magazines.
Played out to the end of this stupid F’n game, that’s already been demonstrated by human history, those idyet ay-whole neighbors will get the shooter to quietly accept slavery, then extinction.
D1ck-check all idyet ay-whole neighbors who needed a job.
Joe R.
9 months ago
If they can get you to go-along with
A N Y T H I N G
then they can get you to go-along with
A N Y T H I N G
Anyone pushing gun-control of any kind needs 150% push back. Take away their driver’s license and their ability to own real estate.
Then start talking to them about food restrictions.
Well to remember that the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is to protect us against abusive government. We need to be well enough armed that the government will think twice before they become blatantly abusive.
Noone will ever have the magazine on a table perfectly ready to load into the gun. Shooter will have to take time to grab it out of their jacket most likely, or pants, or somwhere which will add many seconds in between each magazine
What if two magazines are taped together so all the shorter has to do is flip the magazines? What about a vest with pockets to hold new magazines? You have shown your lack of planning and knowledge. Anyone who wants to shoot the maximum number of rounds in a short time will have planned and practiced how to accomplish that.
Excellent. Am sharing.
If the shooter has agreed to let their idyet ay-whole neighbors who needed a job, got the job, but instead used their authority to abuse power, (their “government”) force them to only possess lower capacity magazines, then those same idyet ay-wholes are that much closer to getting the shooter to accept fewer rounds in those magazines, then fewer magazines, then no magazines.
Played out to the end of this stupid F’n game, that’s already been demonstrated by human history, those idyet ay-whole neighbors will get the shooter to quietly accept slavery, then extinction.
D1ck-check all idyet ay-whole neighbors who needed a job.
If they can get you to go-along with
A N Y T H I N G
then they can get you to go-along with
A N Y T H I N G
Anyone pushing gun-control of any kind needs 150% push back. Take away their driver’s license and their ability to own real estate.
Then start talking to them about food restrictions.
Great idea. Will start doing so. Anticipating shocked and annoyed faces. Too bad.